ANALYZING THE APPLICABILITY AND LIMITATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN RESOLVING THE ISRAEL-PALESTINE TERRITORIAL DISPUTE

Abstract

For numerous years, the global community has engaged in extensive discussions regarding the enduring conflict between Israel and Palestine. This conflict is deeply entrenched in territorial disagreements, the quest for national identity, and the intricate web of socio-political dynamics. In this essay, we will thoroughly analyze the application of international law to the intricate territorial disputes arising from the Israel-Palestine conflict. Through the integration of legal examination and in-depth historical investigation, this study delves into the realm of international legal principles concerning territorial sovereignty, occupation, and self-determination. It critically evaluates the efficacy and constraints of these principles within the specific framework under consideration. Furthermore, it analyzes the functions and past involvements of global legal organizations, such as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC), when it comes to dealing with various aspects of the dispute. This sheds light on the intricate and demanding nature of international legal interventions. Furthermore, the article examines the impact of governmental, cultural, and philanthropic elements, delving into their interconnectedness with judicial strategies in order to discover a solution. By thoroughly analyzing past occurrences, legal structures, and real-life examples, this paper aims to offer a fair and all-encompassing comprehension of the various paths and challenges that international law encounters when dealing with the territorial conflict between Israel and Palestine. The results of this investigation could illuminate the intricate connection between global regulations and geopolitical disputes, providing a basis for forthcoming conversations within legal, diplomatic, and policy spheres.