COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUO MOTO ACTIONS UNDER JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY AND JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR: LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS FOR THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF PAKISTAN

Abstract

This research paper presents a comparative analysis of suo moto actions taken by the Supreme Court of Pakistan under the leadership of Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry and Justice Mian Saqib Nisar. The study explores the legal and constitutional implications of these actions on Pakistan's political system. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry's tenure is characterized by an assertive approach to suo moto actions, aimed at addressing corruption and administrative inefficiencies. In contrast, Justice Mian Saqib Nisar's approach, while also proactive, often focused on issues of public interest and accountability. This paper examines the impact of their respective suo moto actions on the judiciary's role in shaping political dynamics, the balance of power among state institutions, and the public's perception of judicial activism. By analyzing case studies and judicial reviews from both tenures, the paper highlights how these actions have influenced political stability, legislative oversight, and executive accountability. The findings reveal significant variations in the judicial strategies employed and their consequences for democratic governance in Pakistan. The study provides insights into the evolving nature of judicial interventions and their broader implications for constitutionalism and political integrity.